Friday, February 14, 2020

Does the EU have negative impacts on small states in the EU Does it Research Paper - 1

Does the EU have negative impacts on small states in the EU Does it fringe them The divide between the north and the south - Research Paper Example Additionally, it is hard to identify the similarities among the foreign policies of these small states. On the other hand, it is a challenge to enhance the influential factor on their international relations. It comes to a point that we need to plan and strategize what we know and what we need know to identify and understand the challenges facing the small states. This article confirms such doubts by giving answers to four questions: what is a small state according to the European Union? What is the behavior of a small state in the European state? What are challenges facing the small states in the European Union? What are the general effects of European Union on the small states in the European Union? This paper adopts the thesis statement that European developments have brought out many alterations on small states. However, these alterations occur in both positive and negative measures. Smaller states are in consideration because their economic development happens to less than compared to other bigger states such as Britain and France. Additionally, the population level in small states happen to be low than the bigger states. In most cases, such small states have less influence on the decisions made by European Union. Such happenings happen to be in existence because decisions made by European Union during different summits affect these small states in general. For example, the regulations set to regulate the interest levels have affected the small states both positively and negatively. This research is beneficial since it initiates better understanding on the policies affecting small states either positively or negatively. Additionally, this research identifies the major reasons as to why such small states are affected by the policy developments made by European Union. In general, the research will offer differential weight on the benefits and effects of policy development by the European Union to the small states. The relevant question at hand

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Analyze Capital Budgeting Methodologies (NPV, IRR, MIRR, etc..) Research Paper

Analyze Capital Budgeting Methodologies (NPV, IRR, MIRR, etc..) - Research Paper Example Some of the major capital budgeting techniques are: 2. Where â€Å"NPV† is â€Å"zero†, it is acceptable to the organization as it promises equal return to the required rate of return. However, the organization is in differential towards such a project, as it gives no profit. This technique uses discounted cash flows in its analysis, which makes it one of the most accurate capital budgeting techniques. This is because it incorporates and considers both the risk and time variable aspect of the project. Therefore, it measures the net benefit of the project in today’s currency terms (Accounting4managment, n.d). One of the major limitations of NPV method is its difficulty to make accurate forecast of the future cash flows and another is its vulnerability of manipulation through different discount rates as there is no standard to set a discount rate (Michel, 2001). Internal Rate of Return or also called yield on project is actually the rate of return of the investment project earned over the useful life of the project. The benefits and cost of the project are equal to each other at this discount rate. In other words, it is the discount rate where the NPV of the project is zero (Accounting4managment, n.d). There is no specific direct formula for manual calculation of IRR. Instead, the calculation is based on the equation where NPV id zero using various cash flows at different discount rates. However, it can be easily calculated on Excel and financial calculators. 1. Where â€Å"IRR† of the project is greater or equal to â€Å"project’s cost of capital†, the organization accepts the project as it indicates that the return is higher than what organization pay to borrow money for the project. 2. Where â€Å"IRR† of the project is lower than the â€Å"project’s cost of capital†, the organization rejects the project indicating that it would obviously not prefer to receive a return lower than what they pay to borrow